Western Media and Governments immediately blamed Assad even though there was no evidence and Assad had nothing to gain and everything to lose from the attack. The timing of the incident seems to suggest that Assad would have to be insane to do it the day before peace talks which would have been favorable for him.
In 2013 there was a similar incident where Assad was blamed and it turned out to be rebels, as The Washington Times reported.
The Ron Paul Institute reported of the recent attack and some of the fishy details and hypocrisy of western nations in this incident:
Would Syrian President Assad launch a chemical attack on civilians just as peace talks are about to be held and where government gains against ISIS and al-Qaeda rebels give him the upper hand? He would be literally committing suicide. Who benefits from the attack? Not Assad. But the rebels and the US neocons and the warmongers benefit a great deal. Are we about to be taken to war yet again based on lies? Tune in to today’s Liberty Report:
Let us know what you think about the attack in the comments below. Was It Assad or a false flag? Should we wait for more evidence or jump on the bandwagon and immediately blame who we want to look bad regardless of the lack of evidence?
(Article By Jeremiah Jones)